Post by Galadon on Oct 25, 2004 17:28:29 GMT -5
Challenger has posed some questions. My answer are not only for him but all left leaning people.
So you stop terrorism you.....
1. Invade an country with no known connections with terrorist groups.
2. Invade a country with no reason to support terrorism.
3. Invade a country that had never actually expressed the desire to strike the U.S.
4. Invade a country that had nere struck the U.S.
5. Can we say zero WMD's (oh really)
6. The U.S. created more terrorist.
Question 1.
Yes, attack where the terrorist where they are is better than waiting till they attack this country.
With no know connection to a terrorist group. I find this interesting, people who lean to the left like saying this. Let's look a a few things. Beside the fact saddam is a terrorist. But we won't go in to that now, it's side steeping the question. Something Kerry is very good at doing.
1) Do you have secret information no other government has that proves saddam never joined with other terrorist groups? It has to be a secret because I'm almost sure saddam didn't take out a full page ad in the washington post.
I'M HAVING MEETINGS WITH TERRORIST GROUPS.
He was a tyrant not an idiot. Yes there is evidense. Believe it or not it came from other countries beside the U.S
"Where's the proof." you ask. I shown it once but got the responce I expected. That's not right I read something else.
On a personnel note, if I was in Bush's position and had direct evidence, I wouldn't tell the public. Why would you need to know. People on the left decide what they want based more on emotion than facts.
Question 2.
Your kidding right. sidestep, ignore, what ever you want to call it. this question is to absurd to answer. (Ever heard of Kuwait)
Question 3.
This sounds a little like repeating 4. Same answer.
Do you mean you have to heard the word out of saddams's mouth "I'm attacking the U.S." Did saddam's army attack the U.S. no, their not that stupid. Did saddam join in with a terrorist group to bankroll attacking the U.S. But wait I know what your going to say "Well if you don't have proof then I don't believe it." I have had experince in this. You show the evidence and the left just disregards it.
If I can find evidence so can you. I guess you expect me to do all the work.
Question 5.
Zero WMD's. I want someone in here to tell me what they think a WMD is. Not the words, what there discribing. Nukes are an easy answer so tell me a few that you know. Take the dare,, anyone but Hussar, I suspect he will answer. I'm looking for anyone else.
The report made by a questionable person said, "There are no WMD's, AT THE TIME OF ATTACK." I notice alot of left leaners stop at wmd's
The worthless and now proven to be corrupt UN. gave saddam 12 year to get rid of, hide, move to another country, what he had. The incompetent bungling fools that went there actually asked for permission to go in some places. If they didn't get permission they didn't go in. Tell me what is the purpose of sending inspectors, if they are just lead around by the nose.
Yes I can see this every where "Say mr. drug pusher/ terrorist/dog kicker can we inspect your drug lab."
No go away.
Ok we didn't find anything.
Let see, Iran was attacked with WMD's in the war against Iraq. Remember the Kurds in northern Iraq, killed with WMD's, threaten to bomb Israel with WMD's but didn't have the capability. Fired scud's at troops in the 1st gulf war.
Israels bombs a Iraq factory making, well we know it wasn't anything to do with nuke's. Because saddam don't have WMD's
Question 6.
The U.S. created more terrorist, Hmmmmmm, . Explain how the U.S. created terrorist? I would really like to hear that one. Could it be, , That Iraq is the last place they can go. The terrorist lose a big money contributor. Terrorist bases already set up. They don't want to lose that.
It's the U.S. they made terrorist.
Challenger asks "Did I miss anything?"
Well that all depends. If your just out to spread propaganda, no your not missing anything.
If you want to have an informed statement, you will need more information, less knee jerk reactions.
So you stop terrorism you.....
1. Invade an country with no known connections with terrorist groups.
2. Invade a country with no reason to support terrorism.
3. Invade a country that had never actually expressed the desire to strike the U.S.
4. Invade a country that had nere struck the U.S.
5. Can we say zero WMD's (oh really)
6. The U.S. created more terrorist.
Question 1.
Yes, attack where the terrorist where they are is better than waiting till they attack this country.
With no know connection to a terrorist group. I find this interesting, people who lean to the left like saying this. Let's look a a few things. Beside the fact saddam is a terrorist. But we won't go in to that now, it's side steeping the question. Something Kerry is very good at doing.
1) Do you have secret information no other government has that proves saddam never joined with other terrorist groups? It has to be a secret because I'm almost sure saddam didn't take out a full page ad in the washington post.
I'M HAVING MEETINGS WITH TERRORIST GROUPS.
He was a tyrant not an idiot. Yes there is evidense. Believe it or not it came from other countries beside the U.S
"Where's the proof." you ask. I shown it once but got the responce I expected. That's not right I read something else.
On a personnel note, if I was in Bush's position and had direct evidence, I wouldn't tell the public. Why would you need to know. People on the left decide what they want based more on emotion than facts.
Question 2.
Your kidding right. sidestep, ignore, what ever you want to call it. this question is to absurd to answer. (Ever heard of Kuwait)
Question 3.
This sounds a little like repeating 4. Same answer.
Do you mean you have to heard the word out of saddams's mouth "I'm attacking the U.S." Did saddam's army attack the U.S. no, their not that stupid. Did saddam join in with a terrorist group to bankroll attacking the U.S. But wait I know what your going to say "Well if you don't have proof then I don't believe it." I have had experince in this. You show the evidence and the left just disregards it.
If I can find evidence so can you. I guess you expect me to do all the work.
Question 5.
Zero WMD's. I want someone in here to tell me what they think a WMD is. Not the words, what there discribing. Nukes are an easy answer so tell me a few that you know. Take the dare,, anyone but Hussar, I suspect he will answer. I'm looking for anyone else.
The report made by a questionable person said, "There are no WMD's, AT THE TIME OF ATTACK." I notice alot of left leaners stop at wmd's
The worthless and now proven to be corrupt UN. gave saddam 12 year to get rid of, hide, move to another country, what he had. The incompetent bungling fools that went there actually asked for permission to go in some places. If they didn't get permission they didn't go in. Tell me what is the purpose of sending inspectors, if they are just lead around by the nose.
Yes I can see this every where "Say mr. drug pusher/ terrorist/dog kicker can we inspect your drug lab."
No go away.
Ok we didn't find anything.
Let see, Iran was attacked with WMD's in the war against Iraq. Remember the Kurds in northern Iraq, killed with WMD's, threaten to bomb Israel with WMD's but didn't have the capability. Fired scud's at troops in the 1st gulf war.
Israels bombs a Iraq factory making, well we know it wasn't anything to do with nuke's. Because saddam don't have WMD's
Question 6.
The U.S. created more terrorist, Hmmmmmm, . Explain how the U.S. created terrorist? I would really like to hear that one. Could it be, , That Iraq is the last place they can go. The terrorist lose a big money contributor. Terrorist bases already set up. They don't want to lose that.
It's the U.S. they made terrorist.
Challenger asks "Did I miss anything?"
Well that all depends. If your just out to spread propaganda, no your not missing anything.
If you want to have an informed statement, you will need more information, less knee jerk reactions.