Post by Galadon on Oct 29, 2004 12:38:14 GMT -5
The New York Times ran a story about weapons and ammo. They don't directly say it but hinted to the point the ammo dump was just recently looted.
NBC Nightly News gave a different report and proved it. An emmbedded reporting unit was with the 101st AirBorne April 10th, 2003 when Badghdad fell April 9th 2003. When the embedded reporters got to the Al Qaqaa weapons site with the 101st AirBorne, there were no explosives in that cache that everybody thought were going to be there. The explosives had been moved. This story in the New York times will now be listed on many dates December 7th 1941, an attack on Pearl Harbor: September 11th 2001 an attack on our homeland and October 25th, 2004, another attack by the liberal media on our election process.
The democratic party in the New York times, with CBS, 60 minutes in close hot pursuit, launched an October Surprise, or an attempted October Surprised, a sneak attack designed to turn the election with a totally misleading front-page story.
Here is a recap of what happen. NYT, "broke" about 380 tons of explosives that "disappeared" in Iraq. The Times made it sound as though the stuff had disappeard within the last week to ten days. There was a line in their story about how thieves were still looting the area and rummaging around in ths area. The international Atomic Energy Agency was raising quite a fuss about this as was the rest of the liberal press.
This story was going to put Kerry over the top, a shoo in for the white house. There is only one problem the whole story was made up.
CBS, 60 minutes, was going to run this story this coming Sunday night, 24 hours before the election. They were in a heated battle with the New York Times over who was going to get the story first. The question is: Where did the Times get the story? The answer to that is from the United Nations, most specifically Mohammed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Aagency.
ElBaradei who is under fire behind the scenes from the U.S. government for his own incompetenace, for missing the Libya nuclear program and not being strong enough with Iran on their nuclear program and helping to forestall the U.S dealing with Iraq. The U.S. behind the scenes, are trying to get rid of ElBaradei. ElBaradei ten days ago leaked a letter to the media about this phony weapons cache that had never been there when the U.S. troops got to Badhdad.
It's not the size that could be looted away overnight or in a couple days. You would need forty semi-trucks, semi-trailes to haul it away. The bottom line is that the Liberal media was set up just as they were by Bill Burkett and the forged documents because they wanted this story.
It wasn't the Bush campaign, it was NBC nightly News, that we were reminded again that the explosives were already missing when U.S troop arrived at the storage dump on April 10th 2003.
The last time that the IAEA saw the explosives was three months earlier in January of 2003. This is before the invasion of Iraq. No one, including Hans Blix and his inspectors, knows when the explosives left Iraq or where they went. Nobody knows where this stuff is and nobody knows when it was spirited out, but I can tell you what happened because I have a decent modicum here of common sense.
All of our flailing around and messing around at the UN trying to persude the corrupt French and the corrupt Germains to joins us in this war, they were bought off by Saddam, they were "the coalition of the bribed." (remember the oil for food program). We spend all those months, 14 months at the UN while we were posturing and threatening to go to war. We didn't beacause we were trying to get the world to go with us and it was during that period of time that this stuff gets spirirted away.
Thursdya. Oct. 28, 2004
101st AirBorne Vet: "No way explosives were at Al-Qaqaa
A former GI with the 101st AirBorne Division who was among the first American's on the scene at Saddam Hussein's Al-Qaqaa weapons depot said
When we walked into the bunkers there no way there were 380 tons of explosines in those bunkers." 101st AirBorne veteran Ken Dixon.
Instead, said Dixon, The weapons that were left behind at Al-Qaqaa were "regualr RPG's, rockets and hand grenades. There was evidence that something had been removed before U.S forces arrived on the sence.
You had tire tracks in the dried up mud, large tire tracks from big truck and you had boot prints going in and out of these bunkers.
When the 101st arrived on April 10, 2003 the Al-Qaqaa bunkers were "wide open," somebody had already been there and broken the seals placed on the high explosives by the UN. The few crates that were left behind had interesting writing on them but Dixon couldn't read it because it was written in French.
Dixon also said the press who dismiss pre-war Iraq as a major player in global terrorism, that prior to stopping off at Al-Qaqaa, his unit has cleaned out a terrorist training camp.
"There were terrorist training camps all over Iraq."
Now people can vote for who ever they want and ignore things. It's quite clear to me that Dixon was wrong and the liberal bias media is right. Hey come on now how creditable can this guy be, He was only one of the first U.S troops to look in the ammo dump. And of course NBC nightly news is wrong to. How dare they go against the liberal mantra.
"Get Bush by any means possible."
As a parting comment, if it happens and weird things do happen, if Kerry gets in the White House, no one who voted for him can complain about terrorist attacks in this country. You were warned.
NBC Nightly News gave a different report and proved it. An emmbedded reporting unit was with the 101st AirBorne April 10th, 2003 when Badghdad fell April 9th 2003. When the embedded reporters got to the Al Qaqaa weapons site with the 101st AirBorne, there were no explosives in that cache that everybody thought were going to be there. The explosives had been moved. This story in the New York times will now be listed on many dates December 7th 1941, an attack on Pearl Harbor: September 11th 2001 an attack on our homeland and October 25th, 2004, another attack by the liberal media on our election process.
The democratic party in the New York times, with CBS, 60 minutes in close hot pursuit, launched an October Surprise, or an attempted October Surprised, a sneak attack designed to turn the election with a totally misleading front-page story.
Here is a recap of what happen. NYT, "broke" about 380 tons of explosives that "disappeared" in Iraq. The Times made it sound as though the stuff had disappeard within the last week to ten days. There was a line in their story about how thieves were still looting the area and rummaging around in ths area. The international Atomic Energy Agency was raising quite a fuss about this as was the rest of the liberal press.
This story was going to put Kerry over the top, a shoo in for the white house. There is only one problem the whole story was made up.
CBS, 60 minutes, was going to run this story this coming Sunday night, 24 hours before the election. They were in a heated battle with the New York Times over who was going to get the story first. The question is: Where did the Times get the story? The answer to that is from the United Nations, most specifically Mohammed ElBaradei of the International Atomic Energy Aagency.
ElBaradei who is under fire behind the scenes from the U.S. government for his own incompetenace, for missing the Libya nuclear program and not being strong enough with Iran on their nuclear program and helping to forestall the U.S dealing with Iraq. The U.S. behind the scenes, are trying to get rid of ElBaradei. ElBaradei ten days ago leaked a letter to the media about this phony weapons cache that had never been there when the U.S. troops got to Badhdad.
It's not the size that could be looted away overnight or in a couple days. You would need forty semi-trucks, semi-trailes to haul it away. The bottom line is that the Liberal media was set up just as they were by Bill Burkett and the forged documents because they wanted this story.
It wasn't the Bush campaign, it was NBC nightly News, that we were reminded again that the explosives were already missing when U.S troop arrived at the storage dump on April 10th 2003.
The last time that the IAEA saw the explosives was three months earlier in January of 2003. This is before the invasion of Iraq. No one, including Hans Blix and his inspectors, knows when the explosives left Iraq or where they went. Nobody knows where this stuff is and nobody knows when it was spirited out, but I can tell you what happened because I have a decent modicum here of common sense.
All of our flailing around and messing around at the UN trying to persude the corrupt French and the corrupt Germains to joins us in this war, they were bought off by Saddam, they were "the coalition of the bribed." (remember the oil for food program). We spend all those months, 14 months at the UN while we were posturing and threatening to go to war. We didn't beacause we were trying to get the world to go with us and it was during that period of time that this stuff gets spirirted away.
Thursdya. Oct. 28, 2004
101st AirBorne Vet: "No way explosives were at Al-Qaqaa
A former GI with the 101st AirBorne Division who was among the first American's on the scene at Saddam Hussein's Al-Qaqaa weapons depot said
When we walked into the bunkers there no way there were 380 tons of explosines in those bunkers." 101st AirBorne veteran Ken Dixon.
Instead, said Dixon, The weapons that were left behind at Al-Qaqaa were "regualr RPG's, rockets and hand grenades. There was evidence that something had been removed before U.S forces arrived on the sence.
You had tire tracks in the dried up mud, large tire tracks from big truck and you had boot prints going in and out of these bunkers.
When the 101st arrived on April 10, 2003 the Al-Qaqaa bunkers were "wide open," somebody had already been there and broken the seals placed on the high explosives by the UN. The few crates that were left behind had interesting writing on them but Dixon couldn't read it because it was written in French.
Dixon also said the press who dismiss pre-war Iraq as a major player in global terrorism, that prior to stopping off at Al-Qaqaa, his unit has cleaned out a terrorist training camp.
"There were terrorist training camps all over Iraq."
Now people can vote for who ever they want and ignore things. It's quite clear to me that Dixon was wrong and the liberal bias media is right. Hey come on now how creditable can this guy be, He was only one of the first U.S troops to look in the ammo dump. And of course NBC nightly news is wrong to. How dare they go against the liberal mantra.
"Get Bush by any means possible."
As a parting comment, if it happens and weird things do happen, if Kerry gets in the White House, no one who voted for him can complain about terrorist attacks in this country. You were warned.