|
Post by Galadon on Aug 13, 2004 11:45:04 GMT -5
The old liberal, change the subject off Kerry trick. Bush record speaks for him, Oh not the made version by the Libs. On the other hand what attacks, Just the facts. What bill in 19 years of the senate has Kerry's name on it, 0.
If Kerry has done such a great job, why is he just talking about Vietnam, Hmmmmm ?
He has all these secret plans, would you hire someone who told you I'll give you my job experience only after you hire me for the job.
Two well known Demorats have said Kerry is lying about building a international support for him. More about this if your interested.
Bush is getting rid of terrorist, Believe or not this isn't like a drive through at McDonalds. It's not going to happen over night, but even if it did the libs would complain about.
I wonder if you don't agree with getting rid of terrorists What side are you on anyways?
|
|
|
Post by Challenger on Aug 13, 2004 12:56:47 GMT -5
Err Bush isn't getting rid of terrorists. He's doing what the British tried in Northen Ireland and Isriel has been attempting for a good while now. Both the Brits and Isriel failed. The USA is destined to fail. Only reason we have peace in Ireland is because we went to the bargening table and actualy work out an agreement which both parties were more or less happy with.
You can't wage a dirrect war on terrorism. Doesn't work and will never work. All you do is feed the terrorist groups the fear and violence they need to continue to exist.
Challenger
|
|
|
Post by Galadon on Aug 13, 2004 15:35:35 GMT -5
Do you expect to talk with terrorist?
|
|
|
Post by Challenger on Aug 13, 2004 18:26:53 GMT -5
Depends on how you mean it.
Talk while he's trying to kill me well no but creating more is surely a bad way towards getting rid of them.
By all means defend yourself but this is one of those cases where a good offence is a realy realy bad idea. Think on it. A very small percentage of the population of countries that actively assist terrorists groups are prespective terrorists. Invade that country and the entire population might just decide its not such a bad idea after all.
Fact is this is an enemy with infinite numbers and resources that can move from country to country and 9 times out of 10 can strike unnoticed. Now he can't win (short of a few nukes) but you can't beat him by convensonal means. Invade his homeland. He moves house and strikes at your soldiers. Invade his new base and he moves again but now has many more allies and you fewer. Reasoning with a terrorist like Bi Larden is impossible. But dry up his source of recruits and he's done for.
Challenger
|
|
|
Post by Hussar on Aug 14, 2004 10:01:42 GMT -5
Hmm, Bush is getting rid of the terrorists. His own office, after making a slight error in calculations, has just issued a press release stating that terrorism has risen in the past three years, to the point of several times more casualties. And, note, that does not include Spain, because it only went up to 2003. Well done him. Get rid of terrorists by doubling the number of attacks and increasing fatalities many times. Gee, that's something I want to put on my resume.
You want a Kerry bill, howzabout the current one to allow stem cell research. Had Reagan Jr. standing beside him for that little tidbit. Old Miss, I mean, Missus Bush went a couple of rounds with the VP candidate over that one.
|
|
|
Post by Galadon on Aug 15, 2004 14:57:51 GMT -5
Hmmmm 19 years and the only thing Kerry does is, make a useless campaign promise for stem cell. Hmmm, lets see that's really going to improve the econmy.
|
|